About Civil.ge
Eng | Geo | Rus
Last updated: 10:55 - 1 May.'18
RSS
Mobile
Twitter
Facebook
Is Armenia`s flight from Europe accelerating?
Yerevan / 14 Sep.'15 / 11:53
Karena Avedissian

Proposed Constitutional reform triggers debate 

As Armenia`s parliament – the National Assembly – starts its fall session, Constitutional reform dominates the agenda. On September 3, President Serzh Sargsyan held closed-door consultations regarding the draft proposal, while parties supportive of the government are lining up behind it. 


The first announcement for Constitutional reform came on 5 September 2013 -- the day after Armenia abruptly announced it would join the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union instead of signing the Association Agreement (AA) with the European Union. Opposition and civil society actors fear that the proposed constitutional changes further Armenia’s shift away from the European standards, some of which were achieved during the AA negotiations.

Armenia is quickly approaching a juncture of crucial parliamentary and presidential elections in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is constitutionally banned from seeking a third term in office. While most post-Soviet countries have embraced super-presidential systems in the first decade of independence, at the end of their constitutional terms the sitting presidents – and their affiliated ruling parties – discover a sudden interest in parliamentary systems of governance. 

 

 The opposition believes that the proposed changes will not only tip the scales towards the current ruling elite, but that these changes would be nearly impossible to dislodge through democratic, constitutional processes.

 

On September 10, the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe issued its latest Preliminary Opinion which backs up these claims.

The key concerns that both the Venice Commission and the opposition express relate to the rules on electing the National Assembly, the ban on creating new MP factions in the sitting National Assembly, and the considerable obstacles to achieve a vote of non-confidence in the government. While the ruling party claims these provisions of the draft will ensure the stability of governance, opponents argue they will only offer the symbolic trappings of a functioning democracy, but will fall short on substance, leading to a single-party rule.

The proposal would move Armenia away from the mixed - proportional and first-past-the-post majoritarian – model, familiar to Georgian readers, to fully proportional lists. However, if no party obtains an outright majority to form the government, a second round of parliamentary elections will be held, with only the two front-runner parties participating.

This electoral innovation is as novel as it is controversial. The Venice Commission points out similarities with the recently adopted Italian model, while noting that the practice is yet to be tested there.

Further endangering political plurality are the stipulations that MPs can only be elected through proportional representation: they would not be able to change factions once elected. The Venice Commission points out that blocking factions from initiating a no confidence vote in regards to the government would result in a cumulative effect that would make the cabinet – and the powerful Prime Minister - virtually unimpeachable.

Civil society actors do not trust the government’s motives and question the integrity of the looming referendum.

 

Allegations of electoral fraud, corruption, misuse of government resources to support the ruling party, lack of government transparency, and limited independence of the judiciary – come up regularly and are well documented by international and civil society organisations such as Transparency International, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum.

The proposed draft seems to represent a custom-made use of constitutional mechanisms to corrode the democratic order. Constitutional law specialist David Landau calls this “abusive constitutionalism” – a process, in which political actors appropriate democratic institutions to enact constitutional changes that are outwardly consistent with democratic obligations, but that result in practices that are significantly less democratic than before.

The implications of this draft proposal, if adopted in its current form, for the fundamental nature of Armenia’s political system are significant. For now, the government seems to be testing public reaction to the proposals. Some members of the Constitutional Commission, such as Vardan Poghosian, have floated the idea of dropping the two-party run-off clause. Simultaneously, the changes were publicly declared to provide for stipulating marriage solely as the union between a man and a woman, effectively pandering to a conservative nationalist agenda. Some analysts think that the threat of renewed protests might be enough to stop the referendum from going ahead, or to at least instigate the government to modify the draft to a considerable extent.

If, however, the proposals remain as they are, Armenia’s prospects for democracy in the future are substantially diminished while the prospects for better governance will deteriorate. The system envisioned in the proposal will tighten the lid on the pressure-cooker of Armenian politics, making it much more difficult to enact a gradual, peaceful change of government.

Karena Avedissian received her PhD from the University of Birmingham in 2015 for a thesis on social movements in the North Caucasus. Her research interests include the relationship between popular geopolitics and identity, human rights and security, and issues of governance, with a particular emphasis on Russia and Eurasia. She is based in Yerevan, Armenia.

Our permanent page will be up soon.

Read more about The Clarion.

Follow us @TheClarionEU 


This project is supported by:

 

The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania or the Black Sea Trust for Regional Cooperation.

Latest News
01 May.'18 10:55
We Have Moved to a New Platform
Direct Your Bookmarks to https://civil.ge.
29 Apr.'18 03:54
Ruling Party Candidate Wins MP By-Elections
Givi Chichinadze will represent Vani and Khoni single-mandate constituency in the Parliament of Georgia.
28 Apr.'18 09:40
Polls Open for Vani and Khoni MP By-Elections
48,123 voters are eligible to cast their ballots in Vani and Khoni single-mandate constituency.
27 Apr.'18 17:23
State Dept’s Europe Affairs Point Man to Visit Tbilisi
Wess Mitchell will meet senior government officials and address the NATO-Georgia Public Diplomacy Forum.
27 Apr.'18 13:45
In Quotes: Georgian Politicians on Ex-PM Bidzina Ivanishvili’s Comeback
Bidzina Ivanishvili will be approved as the Georgian Dream party chairman at the upcoming convention.
26 Apr.'18 18:15
SG Jens Stoltenberg: Georgia NATO’s ‘Very Close’ Partner
The NATO Secretary General says Foreign Ministers meeting tomorrow will recognize the country’s progress.
26 Apr.'18 14:24
Ex-PM Ivanishvili to Chair Georgian Dream Party
Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili said Ivanishvili was ‘best equipped’ to add new dynamism to the party.
26 Apr.'18 11:12
Lawmaker Proposes Criminal Liability for ‘Insult of Religious Feelings’
The parliamentary human rights committee decided to set up a working group for scrutinizing the draft law.
25 Apr.'18 17:21
New Abkhaz Government Head Appointed
Gennady Gagulia has served as the Abkhaz “prime minister” twice - in 1995-1997, and 2002-2003.
25 Apr.'18 14:43
Watchdog Improves Georgia’s Press Freedom Ranking
None of the countries of the former Soviet Union (except the Baltics) are ranked ahead of Georgia.

About Civil Georgia
Civil.Ge © 2001-2025, Daily News Online
Registered office: 2 Dolidze Str, 4-th Floor.
Creative Commons License
All posts by The Clarion are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
21